FreeJonny1
For
Justice
To deny people their human rights is to challenge
their very humanity. Nelson Mandela
their very humanity. Nelson Mandela
Yesterday I posted an article that outlined the progress (or lack of) that is being made concerning juvenile justice reform and the end of Juvenile Life Without Parole. While we absolutely agree that the crimes committed in these circumstances were horrible and the impact on families lasting, we also have to ask ourselves is this all we can do? In the video I posted, many are asking the question if our current criminal justice practices make sense. As one officer put it, how many times do you want me to arrest these people before you find a better way to solve the problem. Alan Prendergast from Westword has published another article concerning the issue of JWOP and the fate of a man, Jeff Johnson (pictured left), who has been sentenced to Juvenile Life Without Parole. This article gives a face to the criminal that has been given such an extreme sentence. What benefit, if any, do we as citizens of this state receive by keeping Jeff Johnson and others like him in prison for their natural life? Wouldn't we, as citizens, be better served by the rehabilitation and release of Mr. Johnson so that he can pay his own way versus paying for his life long incarceration? Does incarcerating Mr. Johnson make our community better, safer or healthier? Not only do we have to look at the law that caused Mr. Johnson to be condemned for life and see what can and should be done to address the change of said law; we also have to look at the social impact that such laws have had on our society, our mindset and our nature as human beings. Is Jeff Johnson's life the sum of his worst day and worst mistake or is his life to be evaluated on his ability to overcome? Before you answer that question for him, ask the same question of yourself. Do you want your life to be judged by the worst mistake you ever made or are you thankful that you are given the opportunity to correct your course and prove that you are more than your last greatest mistake. Here is the story: Will Juvenile Lifers Get A Second Chance?
0 Comments
One of the most frightening experiences I had as a mother was knowing my son (17 at the time) was held in solitary confinement. He was just a boy and had never been in trouble with the law, he had never experienced incarceration at all....let alone solitary confinement. He had been charged but not tried; he had been interrogated but not investigated; he had been condemned to isolation while he waited for justice. Twenty four hours a day, lights always on, no exercise, no contact. I waited to hear from him everyday. He would call every time the guards would give him time out of his cell for a shower. Sometimes he wouldn't call for 2 or three days. I always called the jail at that point to get a wellness check. They would let him out so he could call. When I would visit we had to speak through plexi-glass on the phone. He always tried to be brave but sometimes the tears would come pouring out. He couldn't understand why he was hated. He hadn't done anything. As painful as that experience was, I cannot imagine what others have experienced that have been held in solitary for years. There is currently a national movement to end this inhumane torture and to stop this cruel punishment. For those who need tools to educate others on this issue, Solitary Watch has created a power point presentation called Solitary 101. This presentation can be used by private organizations for the purpose of education on this issue with proper credit being given to Solitary Watch. Thank you for creating this powerful tool. I also suggest that you subscribe to their blog to receive regular updates on this issue. Here is the link: Solitary Watch
In the days and months following the Supreme Court Decision for Miller and Jackson, many states have been debating, contemplating and trying to find their way forward. It seems that at the point of victory all of the momentum stopped. There are discussions about retroactive sentence reductions, prospective sentence reforms and what to do with kids who come in conflict with the law. Defense attorneys, advocates and juvenile experts have been lobbying for the kinds of sweeping changes that COULD come from all of the recent rulings, exoneration's and the medical findings. We seemed to have lost our nerve....at the time of the last battle we dissolved into confusion. However, changes continue to happen abroad as countries began to reform their juvenile practices. Below is a report on international children's rights from the International Juvenile Justice Observatory: (emphasis in red, mine) Also follow this link to view "TALKING JUSTICE: TALKING SENSE" The International Juvenile Justice Observatory held its Fifth Biennial Conference earlier this week, and the trends are encouraging. I. Deincarceration The fiscal crisis, combined with an expanding awareness and understanding of human rights, is propelling a dramatic reduction in the use of confinement for children in conflict with the law in the U.K. and in Russia, according to a summary by Dr. Frieder Dunkel. This reduction in the use of confinement mirrors the growing deincarceration movement in the U.S. Specific trends include:
Nations struggle with common issues as they reduce reliance on incarceration:
It’s worth noting again and again that the U.S. stands alone in its widespread practice of trying and sentencing children as adults. The international standard of 18 as the age of majority is in full force in comparable “developed” nations. While there is some pushback to create exceptions, there is also a vigorous debate over the need to expand the concept of Child to include youth in the upper teens and early twenties. What is a matter of debate is the age of lower jurisdiction, which is not specifically defined in the CRC. An emerging consensus is settling on the age range of 14 or higher, as recommended in the European Rules. Of course, it goes without saying that if a nation does not try its children in adult court, then adult sentences are also eliminated as possibilities. The U.S. stands alone in its widespread use of natural life sentences and other extreme adult sentences. III. Counsel for Children in Conflict with the Law One emerging trend is a movement of specialization of lawyers for children in conflict with the law. This was a discussion in Italy two years ago. In France, all youth court workers – judges, lawyers, educateurs – must receive specialized training. In France, the law states that every child must be represented by counsel – this requirement under laws in place since February of 1945. There is a well-organized children’s defense movement in France, begun in 2002. The defense lawyers mobilize against repressive measures, with specific concerns over measures like “correctional courts” for minors age 16 and older. Counsel during interrogation - further – nations take seriously the right to counsel at all stages – including the initial stage of interrogation. A decision from the European Court of Human Rights, ruling in the case of Saldez v. Turkey, on access to counsel during interrogation notes, includes reference to Article 37 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and notes in part : ...an accused often finds himself in a particularly vulnerable position at that stage of the proceedings, the effect of which is amplified by the fact that legislation on criminal procedure tends to become increasingly complex, notably with respect to the rules governing the gathering and use of evidence. In most cases, this particular vulnerability can only be properly compensated for by the assistance of a lawyer whose task it is, among other things, to help to ensure respect of the right of an accused not to incriminate himself. This right indeed presupposes that the prosecution in a criminal case seek to prove their case against the accused without resort to evidence obtained through methods of coercion or oppression in defiance of the will of the accused ...http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-89893#{"itemid":["001-89893"]} The court held the lack of legal counsel during police custody constituted a violation of Article 6, Section 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The U.S. stands increasingly alone in its practice of interrogating children without a lawyer. The U.S. stands increasingly alone in its practice of using a confession gained without counsel to try a child in adult court. IV. Ombudsman with 24/7 access to address concerns over Conditions of Confinement for those meeting the Last Resort standard. Concerns over inadequate conditions of confinement were widespread. The U.K. former ombudsman (Sir Albert Aynsley Green, Former Children’s Commissioner for U.K.) recommended that each nation legislatively create an ombudsman with right of 24/7 access to all youth facilities, and further encouraged national ombudsmen to organize to develop uniform practices and standards. V. Concerns over private funding of community based alternatives for prevention and intervention. A particularly lively discussion was held over the variety of private funding schemes under consideration, particularly in the U.K. (note – similar schemes are emerging in the U.S.). One presenter described the Marketization of youth justice products. He noted this is a big movement in the adult system, and emerging in youth systems. The private funding schemes essentially involve utilizing savings from reductions in reoffending to pay independent providers to further reduce reoffending. Two schemes described included Payment by Results and Social Impact Bonds. Essentially, private investors take the risk by providing funding upfront for diversion programs – if the reoffending reduction levels are met the payoff is substantial, but if not met then the investor loses. While the impetus for these schemes is to promote greater efficiency with an emphasis on outcomes, concerns were expressed that this could widen the net through pressure from investors to meet reoffending marks by serving low risk youth. While these private funding schemes may be emerging, public funding continues. There does seem to be an expanding array of publicly funded prevention and intervention services in the U.K. thanks to the hard work of the Youth Justice Board, and an interest in public reinvestment and realignment similar to reforms including Reclaim Ohio and Redeploy Illinois in the U.S. VI. Ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Child nearly universal The U.S. failure to ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child (ratified by every nation except Somalia, South Sudan, and U.S.), is unfathomable to the rest of the world, and undermines our commitment to human rights. Our U.S. reliance on youth incarceration (5 times the rate of any other nation) and our widespread use of adult trial and sentencing of youth as adults are such flagrant violations of fundamental international concepts of human rights for children in conflict with the law that they are shocking to much of the world. To clarify our standing in the international community, the delegate from Argentina reporting on trends in South and Central America suggested the UNICEF representative should not be from the U.S. since we do not ratify the CRC. We must reinvigorate the movement in the U.S. to Ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child. We must move forward with retroactive legislation to rehabilitate and release juvenile offenders who have received life sentences and long term sentences equivalent to life. |
Follow this link to Jonny's Etsy Art Shop
Author
|
copyright 2012 FreeJonny
|
Take Action Our Blog
|